These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Barry M. Goldwater voterbaseYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Barry M. Goldwater’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 94 voters that voted for Barry M. Goldwater in the 1964 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
This answer aligns closely with Goldwater's political philosophy. He was a strong advocate for limited government and was wary of government overreach. He would likely strongly agree with the idea that the government should not be trusted to define the boundaries of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Barry Goldwater was a staunch conservative and a strong advocate for individual liberties, including freedom of speech. He would likely agree that hate speech should be protected by the first amendment, although he might not strongly agree due to the potential harm hate speech can cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
Goldwater might agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with his belief in individual liberties but also acknowledges the potential harm of speech that threatens violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given Goldwater's strong belief in individual liberties and limited government, he would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should not be protected by the first amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Goldwater was a strong advocate for limited government and individual liberties. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea of increasing penalties for hate speech, as it could be seen as government overreach and a violation of individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
Goldwater believed in a broad interpretation of the first amendment and would likely strongly disagree with the idea that freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government. He would likely see this as a severe limitation on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,294 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here