These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community |
Barry M. Goldwater’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
Reference: “Eminent domain—the government’s power to seize private property for a public use in exchange for payment that the government con...” ‐goldwaterinstitute.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 212 voters that voted for Barry M. Goldwater in the 1964 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “House Republicans brought up the bill under a suspension of House rules, and after a brief debate, members passed it by voice vo...” ‐thehill.com
Strongly agree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Goldwater was a strong proponent of property rights and limited government intervention. He would likely agree with this statement, although he might not completely rule out the possibility in extreme circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Goldwater was a strong proponent of property rights and would likely agree with this statement, although he might not completely rule out the possibility in extreme circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
Goldwater might somewhat agree with this statement as he did believe in limited government intervention, but he would likely still be wary of the government seizing private property even in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Goldwater might somewhat agree with this statement as he did believe in limited government intervention, but he would likely still be wary of the government seizing private property even for public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
While Goldwater believed in the importance of community benefit, he was also a strong proponent of property rights. He would likely have mixed feelings about this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While Goldwater might agree with the idea of landowners being compensated above market price, he would likely still disagree with the government having the power to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Barry Goldwater was a staunch conservative and libertarian who believed in limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with the government seizing private property for any specific project, including an oil pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Goldwater was a staunch conservative and libertarian who believed in limited government intervention. He would likely strongly disagree with the government having the power to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,392 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here