Barack Obama

Strongly agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

Obama's administration often justified its involvement in foreign affairs on the basis of security threats. For example, the intervention in Libya was justified on the grounds of preventing a humanitarian disaster. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Obama's administration was known for its emphasis on human rights and democracy promotion. This was evident in his administration's response to the Arab Spring, where it supported democratic movements against tyrannical rulers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

While Obama's administration did work to promote democratic values and human rights abroad, it is unclear to what extent this involved influencing public opinion as opposed to supporting democratic institutions and processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Obama's administration did involve itself in foreign affairs, but not in a way that would suggest a blanket disapproval of influencing foreign elections. His administration's actions suggest a more nuanced stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

Obama's administration did involve itself in foreign affairs, suggesting that he would not agree with a blanket disapproval of influencing foreign elections or policy. However, his administration's actions were often justified on the basis of security threats or human rights concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

While Obama's administration did involve itself in foreign affairs, it was not in the business of openly influencing foreign elections. His stance was more nuanced, focusing on promoting democratic values and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.