Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Domestic Policy

Andrew Yang’s policy on gun control

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?

  Public statementsYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Andrew Yang’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Reference: “Promote a stringent licensing system, with a 5-year renewal requirement, for gun ownership. Anyone desiring a license would need...” ‐yang2020.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Andrew Yang voters

Answer: Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Importance: Most Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 465 voters that have pledged to vote for Andrew Yang in the 2028 Presidential election.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Forward Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 176 voters that identify as Forward.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here