Andrew Yang

Agree

Yes

The Forward Party emphasizes political reform, moderation, and reducing polarization, often supporting measures that increase voter choice and legislative effectiveness. Allowing lawmakers three terms instead of two could promote greater legislative experience and continuity, which aligns with the party's focus on pragmatic governance. While the Forward Party has not taken a specific stance on Nebraska's term limits, its general support for reforms that improve government functionality suggests it would lean toward supporting an extension of term limits to three terms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Opposing an increase in term limits would maintain the status quo, which can sometimes limit legislative expertise and continuity. The Forward Party's reform-oriented platform typically favors changes that enhance the effectiveness of government and provide voters with more choices. Therefore, it would likely disagree with maintaining the current two-term limit, as it may restrict the ability of effective lawmakers to continue serving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.