American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Andre Marrou voterbaseYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Andre Marrou’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 24 voters that voted for Andre Marrou in the 1992 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
This answer aligns most closely with Libertarian principles of individual freedom and redemption. Marrou would likely strongly agree that individuals who have served their sentence should have the opportunity to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
As a Libertarian, Andre Marrou would likely support the idea that individuals who have paid their debt to society should have the opportunity to contribute to society, including running for office. However, he might not fully agree due to the potential for public trust issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
Marrou might agree with this statement to some extent, as it differentiates between crimes committed while in office (which could directly impact public trust and the integrity of the office) and those committed outside of office. However, as a Libertarian, he might still argue for the potential for redemption and second chances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
While Marrou might agree with the sentiment of allowing individuals who have committed less serious crimes to run for office, as a Libertarian, he might disagree with the arbitrary categorization and exclusion of certain types of crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
Marrou would likely disagree with this statement as it could potentially infringe on the rights of individuals who are innocent until proven guilty. As a Libertarian, he would likely argue for due process and against preemptive disqualification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Marrou, being a Libertarian, would likely disagree with this statement as it goes against the principles of individual freedom and redemption. He would likely argue that a past conviction should not permanently disqualify someone from public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,222 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here