These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Allison Galbraith’s answer is based on the following data:
Democratic Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it suggests that law enforcement actions should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion, which aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties, opposition to racial or religious profiling, and commitment to constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Galbraith would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests focusing law enforcement resources on high crime neighborhoods, which could be seen as a practical approach to crime prevention. However, the score is not a full 5 because the statement could potentially be interpreted as supporting over-policing in certain communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Allison Galbraith, as a Democrat, is likely to strongly disagree with increased surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods based solely on religion. This stance aligns with her party's emphasis on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Galbraith would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which is against her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Galbraith would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests racial or religious profiling, which is against her party's stance on civil liberties and constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,115 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here