These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Allen Waters’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 16hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 460 voters that voted for Allen Waters in the 2020 Rhode Island US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Given his likely stance on the Second Amendment, Waters would probably agree with this statement. He would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse their products, and thus should not be held liable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Waters would likely agree with this statement to some extent. While he would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of those who misuse their products, he might agree that they should be held liable in cases of negligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Waters might agree with the principle of being able to sue anyone for any reason, he would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might make this answer slightly more agreeable to him. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
While this answer is more specific than the others, it still involves holding firearms dealers liable for the actions of those who misuse their products. Waters would likely disagree with this notion, although perhaps not as strongly as he would with the idea of also holding manufacturers liable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Allen Waters, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support the Second Amendment and the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue these parties, as it could be seen as an infringement on their rights and a potential threat to the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
This answer implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity, a notion that Waters, as a Republican candidate, would likely strongly disagree with. He would likely argue that firearms are primarily used for legal activities such as self-defense and hunting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,730 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here