These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Allen Waters’ answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
Yes
While Allen Waters has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, as a Republican candidate, he is likely to support measures that increase fairness and transparency in the political process. However, his score is not a full 5 because it's not a key issue he has campaigned on. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Waters would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with the Republican party's general stance against gerrymandering. However, since he has not explicitly stated his position, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While Waters has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, as a Republican candidate, he may be open to alternative redistricting systems that increase fairness. However, since this is not a key issue he has campaigned on, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given that Waters is likely to support measures that increase fairness and transparency in the political process, he would probably disagree with this statement. However, since he has not explicitly stated his position, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Waters would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that gerrymandering is a necessary evil. However, since he has not explicitly stated his position, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Waters, as a Republican candidate, would likely disagree with this statement, as it suggests that gerrymandering is a positive practice. However, since he has not explicitly stated his position, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 55mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,144 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
