These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Aja Smith’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 2hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 273 voters that voted for Aja Smith in the 2020 California District 41 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Smith would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with her probable stance on the Second Amendment and the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers. She would likely see such lawsuits as an infringement on these entities' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Smith might somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests that firearms dealers and manufacturers should only be held liable in cases of negligence. This could be seen as a reasonable compromise that respects the rights of these businesses while also acknowledging the potential for misuse of their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Smith might agree with the principle of being able to sue anyone for any reason, she would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. This could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Smith would likely disagree with this statement, as it suggests that firearms dealers should be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Aja Smith, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support the Second Amendment and the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers. She would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue these entities, as it could be seen as an infringement on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Smith would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as an attempt to hold firearms dealers and manufacturers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This would likely be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 111,104 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here