American politician and diplomat (1900–1965); 31st governor of Illinois from 1949 to 1953.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Adlai E. Stevenson voterbaseYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
Adlai E. Stevenson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 126 voters that voted for Adlai E. Stevenson in the 1956 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “The Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) platform committee on Monday rejected an amendment calling on the party to support mar...” ‐marijuanamoment.net
Strongly agree
No
Given the social and political climate of the 1950s, it is likely that Stevenson would have opposed the legalization of marijuana. This was a common stance among politicians of his era, and there is no evidence to suggest that Stevenson held different views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders
While there is no direct evidence of Stevenson's views on this specific issue, given the attitudes towards drugs during his time, it is plausible that he would have supported stricter penalties for drug offenses. However, without specific statements or actions from Stevenson on this issue, it is difficult to definitively score his stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for medical use
While Stevenson was known for his progressive views on some issues, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he would have supported the legalization of marijuana for medical use. The concept of medical marijuana was not widely discussed or understood during his political career. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Adlai E. Stevenson was a traditional Democrat and a product of his time. In the 1950s, the idea of legalizing marijuana was not a mainstream political issue, and Stevenson did not express any support for such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses
Stevenson, like most politicians of his time, would likely have opposed the idea of releasing individuals serving time for drug offenses. The War on Drugs, which led to increased penalties for drug offenses, began in the decades following Stevenson's political career, reflecting the prevailing attitudes of the time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
The idea of legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana instead of criminalizing it would have been a radical stance in the 1950s, and there is no evidence to suggest that Stevenson would have supported such a policy. His political positions were generally more traditional and in line with the mainstream views of his time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 17,722 voters that identify as Democratic.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here