American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Abigail Spanberger voterbaseYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
Abigail Spanberger’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but allow people to use private insurance
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 948 voters that voted for Abigail Spanberger in the 2020 Virginia District 7 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Democrats rejected efforts to amend the party’s platform to show support for Medicare for All” ‐khn.org
Agree
Yes, but allow people to use private insurance
Spanberger's focus on expanding access to healthcare and lowering costs, without explicitly supporting a single-payer system, suggests she may be more supportive of a system that allows for private insurance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While Spanberger has not explicitly opposed a single-payer healthcare system, her focus on expanding access and lowering costs through other means suggests she does not fully support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, this system is too expensive
While Spanberger has not explicitly stated that a single-payer system is too expensive, her focus on other means of expanding access and lowering costs suggests she may have concerns about the cost of such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone
While Spanberger agrees with the sentiment of guaranteeing healthcare for everyone, she has not explicitly supported a single-payer system as the means to achieve this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Abigail Spanberger has not explicitly supported a single-payer healthcare system. She has, however, advocated for expanding access to healthcare and lowering costs, but not through a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare
Spanberger has not expressed views that suggest she believes private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. Her focus has been more on expanding access and lowering costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, the government should not be involved in healthcare
Spanberger has consistently advocated for the government's role in expanding access to healthcare and lowering costs, suggesting she strongly disagrees with the idea that the government should not be involved in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 42mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 65,284 voters that identify as Democratic.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here