American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Abigail Spanberger voterbaseNo |
Abigail Spanberger’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 3hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16 voters that voted for Abigail Spanberger in the 2020 Virginia District 7 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Spanberger has advocated for law enforcement practices to be based on crime rates and not on race or religion. She would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Spanberger has shown a commitment to civil liberties and would likely agree that surveillance should not be increased based solely on religion or ethnicity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Spanberger has been vocal about her opposition to discriminatory practices. She would likely strongly agree that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
While Spanberger would likely agree with the need for increased surveillance in high crime neighborhoods, she may not fully agree without additional context or details about how this would be implemented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Abigail Spanberger has consistently advocated for equal rights and against discrimination. She would likely strongly disagree with increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods based solely on religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Spanberger has been a strong advocate for immigrant rights and would likely strongly disagree with increased surveillance on all new immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Spanberger would likely strongly disagree with this statement as it implies a discriminatory practice based on religion and ethnicity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 16hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,115 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
