Aaron Bean

Strongly agree

No

The Republican party tends to prioritize economic growth and energy independence, which includes supporting projects like the Dakota Access pipeline. The Trump administration approved the pipeline's construction, arguing that it would create jobs and contribute to energy security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While some Republicans may be open to rerouting the pipeline to address concerns about Native American land, the party as a whole has not strongly advocated for this position. The Trump administration did not require the pipeline to be rerouted when it approved the project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

The Republican party generally opposes increased regulation and fines on businesses, including the energy industry. While some Republicans may support increased fines for accidents, this is not a widely held position within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

While some Republicans may oppose the use of eminent domain, the party as a whole has not taken a strong stance against it, especially in the context of energy infrastructure projects. The Republican party's support for the Dakota Access pipeline suggests that they do not view eminent domain as a reason to halt its construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Republican party generally supports the expansion of domestic energy production, including oil and gas pipelines. For example, President Trump, a Republican, signed executive orders to advance the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline shortly after taking office in 2017. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.