Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Domestic Policy

Charles Langevin’s policy on social security

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government raise the retirement age for Social Security?

  Personal answerNo, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead

Charles Langevin’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: No, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Charles Langevin is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on March 2nd, 2020

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “The battle over Social Security's future came back to the forefront Wednesday as top Republicans on the Senate Budget Committee ...” ‐politico.com

This candidate disagrees with their party on this issue.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,631 voters that identify as Republican.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here