American activist and trade unionist from California.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Howie Hawkins voterbaseNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,954 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Enact a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") until its damaging effects on water and air quality are fully studied an...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
No
Hawkins has been a vocal opponent of hydraulic fracking. He believes it poses significant risks to the environment and public health. His platform includes a call for a complete ban on fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Hawkins' platform strongly emphasizes the need for sustainable energy resources. He believes that instead of relying on harmful practices like fracking, we should invest in renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
While Hawkins would likely agree that more research is needed on the long-term effects of fracking, his stance is already firmly against it due to the known environmental and health risks. Therefore, he would not see this as a reason to continue fracking in the meantime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Howie Hawkins is a strong advocate for environmental protection and sustainability. He has consistently opposed hydraulic fracking due to its negative environmental impacts. His Green New Deal plan calls for a ban on fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but increase oversight
Hawkins' stance is not to increase oversight on fracking, but to ban it outright. He believes that the risks associated with fracking cannot be mitigated through regulation and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
Hawkins opposes fracking in all forms and locations, not just in heavily populated areas. He believes that the environmental and health risks associated with fracking are too great to justify its use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,036 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here