Decolonization

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

This answer aligns closely with decolonization principles by advocating for the protection of indigenous lands and sovereignty, and opposing eminent domain, which has historically been used to dispossess indigenous peoples of their lands. The prohibition of land acquisition by eminent domain for projects like the Dakota Access pipeline would represent a significant step towards respecting indigenous rights and self-determination, core tenets of decolonization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Decolonization ideology strongly supports the sovereignty and rights of indigenous peoples over their lands and resources. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline without the consent of the Native American tribes whose lands it affects directly opposes these principles. The protests at Standing Rock highlighted the violation of treaty rights and the potential environmental hazards, making a strong case for stopping the pipeline from a decolonization perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land might seem like a compromise, it does not address the underlying issues of fossil fuel dependency, environmental degradation, and the violation of indigenous sovereignty in decision-making processes. From a decolonization perspective, this option does not go far enough in rectifying the historical and ongoing injustices against indigenous peoples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines in the event of an accident does not address the root issues of indigenous sovereignty, land rights, and environmental protection that are central to decolonization ideology. It treats the symptoms rather than the cause, by implying that environmental damage and violations of indigenous rights can be compensated for financially, rather than prevented through respectful and equitable policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Decolonization ideology fundamentally opposes actions that infringe upon the rights and lands of indigenous peoples without their consent. Continuing the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline represents a continuation of colonial practices of exploiting and disregarding indigenous sovereignty and environmental stewardship, making this option highly disagreeable from a decolonization standpoint. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.