Ambivalent Right

Agree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a pragmatic approach to governance, might see the benefits in government incentives for carpooling and shared transportation services as a means to reduce traffic congestion, lower emissions, and promote community cohesion. However, their support might be tempered by concerns over government overreach and the potential for such programs to become financially burdensome or inefficiently managed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While the Ambivalent Right may harbor skepticism towards government intervention in the market, they are not inherently opposed to all forms of government incentives. Their ambivalence stems from a cautious approach to governance that values both individual freedom and community welfare. Thus, outright opposition to incentives for carpooling and shared transportation services would not be fully aligned with their ideology, as they might recognize the potential benefits of such measures in specific contexts, especially if they are framed as supporting economic efficiency and public good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.