Alter-Globalization

Very strongly agree

No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

This answer aligns closely with the alter-globalization movement's emphasis on protecting civil liberties and opposing measures that could lead to increased government control. The movement's history of opposing policies perceived as encroachments on individual freedoms, such as those discussed in forums like the World Social Forum, supports this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

This ideology tends to support measures that protect individual freedoms and privacy, opposing broad surveillance measures that could infringe on these rights. The skepticism towards unchecked technological and governmental power aligns with the movement's history of advocating for more democratic and transparent governance, as seen in various global forums and protests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

This answer reflects a nuanced position that acknowledges the potential benefits of technology while expressing a lack of trust in the entities that control it. This skepticism towards power structures, whether corporate or governmental, is a hallmark of the alter-globalization movement, evidenced by their critical stance on global institutions and agreements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

While regulation and transparency might address some concerns, the fundamental opposition to mass surveillance and the potential for abuse likely remains a significant issue for alter-globalization advocates. Their skepticism towards the ability of governments and corporations to manage such technologies responsibly, informed by historical instances of misuse, would temper any support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities

While targeting criminal hotspots might seem like a compromise, alter-globalization advocates are likely to be concerned about the potential for racial profiling and the infringement on privacy rights. Their emphasis on social justice and equity makes them wary of solutions that could disproportionately affect marginalized communities, a concern that has historical precedence in their advocacy work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would be too expensive to implement

While alter-globalization advocates are concerned about the cost implications of global and governmental actions, their primary objections to facial recognition technology for mass surveillance are more likely to be based on ethical and privacy concerns rather than financial cost. This reflects a broader trend in the movement's focus on social and environmental justice over economic efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Alter-globalization movements, which advocate for global cooperation while opposing neoliberal globalization, generally prioritize individual freedoms and are wary of state surveillance. The use of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance would likely be seen as a violation of these freedoms, reminiscent of concerns raised during protests such as the 1999 Seattle WTO protests where activists opposed increasing global and state control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.