In a day of legal drama at the Supreme Court, two significant rulings were handed down, stirring the legal pot and sparking conversations across social media platforms.
The first ruling, Culley v. Marshall, saw the Court split 6-3, with Justice Kavanaugh leading the majority in affirming that while a timely forfeiture hearing is required in civil forfeiture cases involving personal property, a separate preliminary hearing is not mandated by the Due Process Clause.
Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, raising concerns about the balance between property rights and due process.
Meanwhile, in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, the Court ruled 6-3 that the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to monetary relief for any timely infringement claim, regardless of when the infringement occurred.
Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito, dissented, arguing for a more nuanced approach to copyright damages. With these rulings, the Court has set the stage for further debates on civil liberties and intellectual property rights, leaving legal enthusiasts eagerly awaiting the next chapter in the Supreme Court's ongoing saga.
Sigues el primer a respondre a aquest discussió general .