You are reasoning in a circle, my friend. One heck of circle. Because if no one can "use" your body…
If you are the perpetrator in the case of violating someone else's consent, then you do not get any say in how that person, the victim, reacts to defend themselves from you. This is the case in every interaction. If someone is assaulting you, then you have every right to take defensive action against them, including killing them, if need be; they give up their protections from you upon violating you. If someone breaks into your home, if someone is raping you, if someone is trying to force a medical procedure onto you, etc...you have the right to take defensive action against anyone who invades and violates you, which is exactly what an abortion is.
According to your line of reasoning, if someone is violating you, and you fight back and kill them, then you are now guilty of murder, because "I'm pretty dang sure the attacker would object to "using" his/her body for murder"...yet obviously that is not how consent works, and we both already understand that.
كن أول من يرد على هذه تعليق .