Try the political quiz

31 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

If you discovered your nation was secretly aiding another country in a conflict, would it change your perception of your government and why?

 @9LSLGPTRepublican from Oregon answered…1mo1MO

I dont think it would change my perception of my government, because I would go along with their idea. I would think its the best for us.

 @9LSNNX5 from Louisiana disagreed…1mo1MO

If I felt that the nation shouldn't be helping another country or involve themselves in anothers affairs than I would not support their effort.

 @9LSLLHPfrom Guam answered…1mo1MO

Yes because the government has a history of starting and perpetuating forever wars against the will of the people and without congressional approval, then lying about it. They have proven themselves untrustworthy.

 @9LSMBGJ from North Carolina answered…1mo1MO

 @9LSMN7H from Texas answered…1mo1MO

I'm not sure how to feel about this, I just feel like they are just trying to help a place that has been suffering and that I support it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

What do you think about the ethical implications of one country secretly supplying advanced military technology to another?

 @9LSN6MW from Texas answered…1mo1MO

 @9LSLK2N from Pennsylvania answered…1mo1MO

 @9LSN72G from Idaho answered…1mo1MO

I think it is moraliy questionable and such actions should be under scrintiny by the people

 @9LSLQVL from Hawaii answered…1mo1MO

 @QuailEmiliaGreen from Wisconsin commented…1mo1MO

Great we find this out one day after the Senate passed the new aid bill.

 @HarmoniousWalrusLibertarianfrom Maine agreed…1mo1MO

This was kept secret so the dangers of more aid to Ukraine would not be made evident to the US public

 @R3gulationXerusLibertarianfrom Texas agreed…1mo1MO

This was kept secret so the dangers of more aid to Ukraine would not be made evident to the US public

 @WorriedCicadaDemocrat from Arizona commented…1mo1MO

“Secretly”.

They already sent ATACMS many times before, they already had drawndown authority unspent. It wasn’t secret it was already approved.

This is clickbait.

 @JaguarZoeTranshumanist from Indiana disagreed…1mo1MO

They sent the 300km range version. The previous version was 165km. Nice half truth.

 @GerrymanderArtGreenfrom Maine commented…1mo1MO

Long range missiles that can hit into Russian territory is a provocative move. All for defensive equipment. Offensive equipment harder to justify, IMHO.

 @SparrowBenMountain from Virginia disagreed…1mo1MO

So what? Iran and North Korea have been supplying russia. Fair is fair.

 @RabbitJimmyPatriotfrom Michigan commented…1mo1MO

When Speaker Johnson was photographed at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month, I assumed Putin would be popping champagne in Kyiv by June 1. Long-term forecast for Ukraine looks decidedly better, but still a lot of work to do.

 @CivilRightsMonkeyLibertarian from New Jersey commented…1mo1MO

So essentially, the aid wasn’t approved and us did it anyway. Our constitution is considered irrelevant by govt officials

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Should the public be informed about their government's involvement in international military operations, or are some secrets necessary for national security?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Considering the risks of escalation in international conflicts, do you believe countries should intervene with military support in conflicts outside their borders?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

How would you feel if your country was involved in secretly sending weapons to another country involved in a conflict?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...