More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Democrats
Last answered 6 months ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Democrats.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since May 9, 2015. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
1 year ago by foxnews.com
1 year ago by foxnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Iran Airstrikes
In July 2015 the U.S. reached an accord with Iran to limit their ability to put uranium or plutonium in weapons. Iran agreed to turn one nuclear plant into a scientific research facility and shut another one down. Iran agreed to let the International Atomic Energy Agency inspect these sites. Critics argue that the deal gave too many concessions to the Iranians including a provision that gives them up to 24 days to grant inspectors access to their facilities. Proponents argue that the deal makes the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon in the next 25 years extremely remote. See recent Iran Airstrikes news
More stances on this issue
I am an American who feels that we have taken on the role of the world's parent without being asked most of the time....this, to me, is much the same as having a nosy neighbor who sticks their nose in your business without being asked and very much... 1 year ago from a Democrat in Anchorage, KY
No, but we should not have nuclear capabilities either. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Walpole, MA
No, the IAEA should be given 100% access to every nation's nuclear energy programs (both private and federal) to ensure weapons grade material is being properly disposed of and nations currently possessing nuclear weapons should cooperate in... 1 year ago from a Democrat in Fulton, MO
There must be more than circumstancial evidence. We need to invest in the future of drones but not without well reasoning. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Bryan, TX
No. We are not the World Police!. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Potwin, KS
Yes, if given permission from the UN to go ahead with the bombing. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Hartford, WI
Only with permission from the United Nations. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Athens, OH
Only if it is proven that they are about to become a nuclear threat. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Lakewood, NJ
Only if a deal cannot be done. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Washington, DC
Negotiate first, but with all options on the table... 1 year ago from a Democrat in Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM
Yes, but with solid proof that it is for weapons and there will be no innocent casualties. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Brownstown, IN
I believe we should try to resolve this issue should be resolved through diplomacy first. If diplomacy does not then yes. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Martin, TN
Only if negotiations fail. 1 year ago from a Democrat in West Hartford, CT
Only if there is a confirmed threat to American lives. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Potwin, KS
The Bible tells us to be good stewards of the Earth. Creating a nuclear catastrophe violates that instruction. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Experiment, GA
Only when evidence shows Iran in serious path to developing a nuclear weapon. 1 year ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX