More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Republicans
Last answered 2 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted byRepublicans.
No, but in order to receive benefits they should be looking for a job or enrolled in education and job training programs
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Aug 14, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Washington D.C.
- West Virginia
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
1 year ago by theguardian.com
1 year ago by foxnewsinsider.com
2 years ago by thedodo.com
2 years ago by theguardian.com
2 years ago by msnbc.com
2 years ago by bbc.co.uk
2 years ago by net.au
2 years ago by breitbart.com
2 years ago by youtube.com
3 years ago by dailycaller.com
Data based on 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes... But we should bring back CCC and have jobs repairing roads, repairing bridges, providing training in a trade, etc. not every person can succeed in college and we need to take away the stigma of blue collar vs white collar jobs. The govt can provide additional assistance in the form of food stamps, assistance with fuel oil, etc if a person works full time but doesn't earn enough for living expenses... But no one takes care of or appreciates what is given to them if they don't work to earn it. 3 months ago from a Republican in Anchorage, AK
Yes, they should be required to work. The individual should show up at the welfare office daily and have work interviews or be required to work for there welfare check. There are plenty of jobs that need to be done daily cleaning of municipal buildings , road clean up, etc. 1 month ago from a Republican in San Francisco, CA
Most likely those individuals can't land a job to support them and their families. Some sort of incentive to work is needed as well as the option of continued support to offset the difference of their pay as compared to their welfare check. Also, many times the jobs end in layoffs, etc. the ability to re-enter the programs should not be delayed. 3 months ago from a Republican in Potomac, MD
Yes, if they are able to, and/or be actively looking for work or enrolled in education or job training. Break the cycle of families that remain reliant on the system for generations! They deserve more than that!. 2 years ago from a Republican in San Clemente, CA
Yes, unless they have children. Then they should be required to stay home and take care of their own kids and not put them in substandard day care programs. It is cheaper to stay home and take care of your own children rather than work to pay for someone else to raise them poorly. 2 years ago from a Republican in Saint Joseph, MO
Should be drug tested in order to receive any benefits.
Should be required to reapply every year.
Limit benefits to all those capable of working to the same time frame as unemployment benefits.
Limit the number of dependents that can be included in any one household, at the same address.
No benefits to any man or woman who refuses to identify their mate of their offspring.
Stop the automatic enrollment of all those who become adults while living with a recipient. 2 years ago from a Republican in Mount Wolf, PA
Required to volunteer, do community service, clean the streets, minimum 25 hours a week. 2 years ago from a Republican in Greencastle, PA
No, but they should be looking for a job AND enrolled in education & training programs AND their benefits would expire after 2 years of unemployment. 2 years ago from a Republican in Denver, CO
No, but in order to receive benefits they should be looking for a job or enrolled in education and/or job training programs. 2 years ago from a Republican in Chipley, FL
Yes, AND in order to receive benefits they should be looking for a job or enrolled in education and job training programs. Bobby Kennedy, the liberal's Liberal, railed against welfare in the 1960's. In many ways it has become just what he professed back then. That we, as a society, will indoctrinate continual generations of Americans reliant on the system and not of their own opportunity. People should get a hand up, not a hand out. 2 years ago from a Republican in Madison, NH
They should pass drug tests and work unless they are single parents of children under 16. 2 years ago from a Republican in Killeen, TX
People who can work, should work. People who can't work and need the assistance should be a priority. A person who can't stand, walk, or perform any type of work that is capable of producing a living wage should also be able to collect disability benefits without as much difficulty. 2 years ago from a Republican in Claymont, DE
I think there are special circumstances to this. Even if a person does get a job, like at mcdonalds; chances they are getting paid minimum wage. Minimum wage does not support a family sufficiently even before taxes. They would still need assistance with something one way or an other. I dont like how the government doesnt take transportation into consideration when applying for benifits either. Some places dont have public transportation to get to and from, also for some people it is easier to get approved by a bank to get in a new car compared to a used car. No matter what the inflation is so high that even a person making 12$ an hour barely supports a family of 4 and thats without having anything to put towards savings. 2 years ago from a Republican in Lexington, SC
No, but in order to receive benefits they should be actively looking for work and be enrolled in education and job training programs and the benefits expire after 52 weeks. 2 years ago from a Republican in Alexandria, VA
They should not be penalized for working. and ALL should pass a drug test. 2 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
Yes, but they shouldn't be penalized by working part time - it should subsidize their income. Also encourage temporary jobs; incentives to volunteer work to earn their money. 2 years ago from a Republican in Florissant, MO
No, but unless they are working their benefits cut off after twelve months. No job hopping, no more than three different jobs in three years. MUST TAKE and PASS DRUG TESTS to be eligible for ANY Government assistance. 2 years ago from a Republican in Granbury, TX
Yes. There should be a cut off of 1yr for unemployment, they should have to work for the gov in some way, and they have to prove they are looking for jobs or enrolled in education and job training programs. If I have to work for my money than you have to work for free gov money. 2 years ago from a Republican in Columbus, OH
Requires that you must be looking for a job, not on drugs, you can only be on it from 10 months, and you must have been employed at your last job for 10 months. 2 years ago from a Republican in Lovejoy, MO
No. able-bodied capable adults shouldn't receive welfare at all. 2 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
Yes! Why are they receiving welfare if they are able? Look for work and give them a timeline, one year!. 2 years ago from a Republican in Garden City, ID
Yes, they should complete a minimum number of community service hours to remain in the program. 2 years ago from a Republican in Shrewsbury, NJ
Yes, within a reasonable expectation of their capabilities and with opportunity for training. 2 years ago from a Republican in New Baltimore, MI
No but there should be a two year expiration on benefits and they should be seeking employment, receiving education and or training during that time and be able to pass drug tests to receive said benefits. 2 years ago from a Republican in Marion, TX
They should work if they want to. But "Able bodied, mentally capable" adults shouldn't be allowed to take advantage of a gov't paycheck, AKA free money. That system is in place for folks that need temporary help. It's not a permanent paycheck. 2 years ago from a Republican in Nashville, TN
No, but in order to receive benefits they must be actively looking for a job, enrolled in education/job training programs, and must also pass a drug test. If they fail the drug test, they are automatically eliminated from receiving benefits and may reapply in several months. 2 years ago from a Republican in Miamisburg, OH
Unemployment benefits should start out at double what they currently are and taper down each month, reaching zero after 6 months. They should also be limited to once every 10 years at most. 2 years ago from a Republican in University Park, PA
Not if they need to care for an infant, sick relative, or elderly relative--in those cases, the care they are providing is a community service and should count as "work.". 2 years ago from a Republican in Saint Louis, MO
No, but in order to get benefits they should be looking for a job or enrolled in education and job training programs. Also should have drug screening. 2 years ago from a Republican in Lincoln, NE
All welfare recipients who are able bodied and mentally capable should be in job training programs and get a paycheck instead of welfare check by working at low-level jobs for the government - receptionists, assistants, maintenance, janitorial, as "runners" or messengers, national and state park services, road 7 bridge maintenance, etc. 2 years ago from a Republican in Hickory Hills, IL
No, but to get benifits it should require looking for a job, or going to school and a drug test to get benifits, as well as benifits should end after two years of unemployment. 2 years ago from a Republican in Bentonville, AR
No, but in order to receive benefits they should be looking for a job or enrolled in education and job training programs, they should also have to pass a drug test. 2 years ago from a Republican in Fairport, NY
Financial assistance should be limited to those whose situation is beyond their control. Penalties for abusing the system should be enforced. 2 years ago from a Republican in Gladstone, MI
Yes unless they are the primary care givers to minor children, in which case the non custodial parent should be forced to pay child support. More should be done to get non custocials to pay. 2 years ago from a Republican in Burlington, VT
Yes, but if they are at least looking for a job or enrolled in education and job training programs, they would still qualify. 2 years ago from a Republican in Hyde Park, UT
Yes, but they make the choice not the states or feds, no work no pay, if they need training supply it, but no everlasting dole. 2 years ago from a Republican in Webster, WI
Yes. Any program that give you something has a right to put reasonable conditions upon the receipt of the benefit-the same as it sets conditions that make one "entitled" to the benefit. 2 years ago from a Republican in Grand Rapids, MI
I don't mind people receiving benefits, but if they are able to work they should be looking for work, or in some type of educational program designed to help them improve themselves. They should also be required to pass frequent(monthly) drug screenings. If the screening is failed, benefits should be curtailed. 2 years ago from a Republican in North Charleston, SC
Mental maturity is still a consideration. 2 years ago from a Republican in Washington, DC
Everyone should work at ANY job that their abilities/disabilities permit. 3 years ago from a Republican in Huntsville, AL