More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Republicans
Last answered 9 months ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Republicans.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 30, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
1 year ago by phys.org
2 years ago by phys.org
2 years ago by addictinginfo.org
3 years ago by caranddriver.com
3 years ago by mashable.com
3 years ago by foxnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Fuel Efficiency
In President Obama's January 28th State of The Union address he announced that he would issue an executive order to double the average fuel efficiency of cars and trucks by 2025. By raising the standards administration officials estimate that Americans will reduce their annual consumption of oil by 12 billion barrels and save them $1.7 trillion in fuel costs. Opponents say that automakers will have to absorb enormous costs to make their cars and trucks meet the standards and consumers will ultimately bear the cost due to the higher retail prices of new automobiles. Thirteen major automakers have spoken in support of the rule which will be subject to a cost review in 2020. If automakers are not yet near the standards at that time the mileage could be reduced to match their capabilities. See recent fuel efficiency news
More stances on this issue
No, research a more renewable energy to power trucks or just let the invisible hand of the market guide consumer and producer choices. 2 years ago from a Republican in New Bremen, OH
Yes, Within reasonable efficiencies. 3 years ago from a Republican in Tampa, FL
No. There is enough government regulation to completely strangle what economy is left in America for the next thousand years. 3 years ago from a Republican in Pikeville, KY
Would drive up price of natural gas which many people heat their homes with. 3 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
The Feds should get out of picking winners in the regulations and tax market. I like the fair tax conceipt. 3 years ago from a Republican in Maitland, FL
No. Diesel is just fine. 3 years ago from a Republican in Kinston, NC
Only if those fuels can be verified as originating in the United States or one of its allied nations. 3 years ago from a Republican in Palm Bay, FL
All car companies have to do is add a pressurize tank on it and change a couple parts on the motor to make natural gas instead of gas. It would not cost that much and they should be given tax breaks to do it. 3 years ago from a Republican in Gurley, AL
Give them an incentive to meet the standards, but don't force them to. 3 years ago from a Republican in Fenton, MO
I would need to see some reliable data on how efficient these would be, we already know that Alcohol is an inefficient fuel for vehicles and should be removed from all gasoline. 3 years ago from a Republican in Heiskell, TN
Yes but, it should be a goal to increase efficiency of our Heavy truck fleets. Wether they run of diesel, natural gas or bio diesel. Our over all goal is to bring the cost to delivery down. 3 years ago from a Republican in North Olmsted, OH
In this circumstance I am pro bio-diesels. You can run a fleet of heavy duty trucks just from McDonald's throw away frying oils. No brainer. 3 years ago from a Republican in Goldsboro, NC