Quiz  |  Polls  |  Candidates  |  Taxes  | 
Answer ThisAnswer this

More Popular Issues

See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...

Should the government be allowed to seize private property, with reasonable compensation, for public or civic use?

Results from Republicans

Last answered 7 months ago

Eminent Domain Poll Results for Republicans

Yes

25,462 votes

84%

No

4,893 votes

16%

Distribution of answers submitted by Republicans.

3 Yes answers
2 No answers
0 overlapping answers

Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 29, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.

Choose a demographic filter

State

City

Party

Ideology

Website

* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)

Yes No Importance

See more eminent domain news

Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.

Learn more about Eminent Domain

Eminent domain is the power of a state or a national government to take private property for public use. However, it can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private persons or corporations, when they are authorized to exercise the functions of public character. Opponents, including Conservatives and Libertarians in New Hampshire, oppose giving the government the power to seize property for private projects, like casinos, that was made possible to a 2005 Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. New London. Proponents, including advocates of oil pipelines and national parks, argue that the construction of roads and schools would not be possible if the government could not seize land under eminent domain.  See recent eminent domain news

More stances on this issue

Discuss this issue...