The Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act would allow California to borrow $11.1B (27% towards water storage, 20% towards sustainability, 15% towards ecosystem and watershed restoration, 11% towards water recycling and treatment facilities, 13% towards water management, 9% towards groundwater protection and cleanup, and 4% towards drought relief and safe drinking water). The bond would be funded by California taxpayers through the state's general fund.
63% Yes |
37% No |
55% Yes |
24% No |
8% Yes, California's water system is in desperate need of any overhaul |
8% No, we need to balance our budget first |
3% No, the costs of overhauling California's water system should be paid for by wealthy farmers and agricultural business |
|
2% No, this proposition does not protect California's Delta region |
See how support for each position on “California Water Act” has changed over time for 149k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “California Water Act” has changed over time for 149k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH10yrs10Y
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO