More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Republicans
Last answered 10secs ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Republicans.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 21, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Washington D.C.
- West Virginia
- Fox News
- Google Plus
- Project To Restore America
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
1 year ago by washingtonpost.com
1 year ago by huffingtonpost.com
1 year ago by princeton.edu
1 year ago by thinkprogress.org
2 years ago by newsobserver.com
2 years ago by occupydemocrats.com
Data based on 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Gerrymandering
Currently, the redistricting of congressional boundaries is controlled by state legislature every ten years. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of districts with the intent of benefiting a political party. It is most often implemented by state political parties with the intent of marginalizing districts of voters who represent the minority party. To gain extra seats, the incumbent party will redraw voting districts so that voters of the minority party will be grouped into smaller districts with less seats. Critics of gerrymandering say these practices allow incumbent representatives to choose their voters instead of voters choosing them. Proponents say that drawing districts is a privilege of the ruling party and have little effect on the popularity of their policies or candidates. See recent gerrymandering news
More stances on this issue
It should be done by a non partisan computer generated program that takes into account only the necessary municipal and population to draw a fair district. Political registration numbers shouldn't be available for use in the program. 1yr ago from a Republican in Quentin, PA.
Districts should be drawn strictly by mathematics and not by use of any partisan or demographic information other than voting population. 1yr ago from a Republican in Chesapeake Beach, MD.
No, Gerrymandering is a problem, but no commission can ever be truly non-partisan. At least having the redrawing of districts determined by elected officials provides the public a means of redress if it becomes sufficiently troublesome. 1yr ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS.
Have different states redraw the districts. Example: Florida studies and redraws the districts in the state of Nebraska. You can't get to much more non-partisan than that. 1yr ago from a Republican in Goldsboro, NC.
Who's to call the commission non-partisan??? Honestly it will be another corrupt group making decisions to benefit another overpaid politician...Gerrymandering needs to be eliminated, at the same time we need to revisit our own constitution and do away with the bullshit parlor games; lets stop the self-implosion. 1yr ago from a Republican in Poway, CA.
Generally, Gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting, but the same could be said of the appointees to a commission as well. My only, highly impractical alternative would be assigning citizens of a state to a particular congressional district at random, rather than by geographical area. This would ensure that all citizens of that state were represented equally, rather than by gerrymandered districts. 1yr ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS.
No, because it would be impossible for a so-called "non-partisan" commission to be completely unbiased politically, especially considering it would need to be chosen or created by members of a political party in power. Since most states experience a sway of political momentum, redrawing of districts tends to even out over time in terms of how advantageous it is to one party or another retaining power long term. 1yr ago from a Republican in Swartz Creek, MI.
Yes, and they should make districts square and uniform so that elections are (could be) fair. 2yr ago from a Republican in Anchorage, AK.
Let the states decide how they want to divide their own districts, and let the divisions allowed be based on population with each state having a minimum and maximum number of Congressmen/women with the number being based upon the solvency of the economy of each State. If a state is not solvent, they should not be allowed to have equal representation in the governing decision process. 2yr ago from a Republican in Wichita, KS.
Yes . No more Gerrymandering for unfair advantage by party in power during redistributing Andy it should be done by a multi - member, proportionally selected for redistricting. 2yr ago from a Republican in Spring Valley, NY.
Congressional districts should be drawn with straight parallel lines running coast-to-coast and border to border. Spacing between lines could be varied but nothing else. 2yr ago from a Republican in Colorado Springs, CO.
Congressional numbers are created by the increase/decreased of voting populations. Therefore, a simple program of following population densities by dividing those districts that have growth and enlarging those districts which have population reductions so all districts have equal numbers!. 2yr ago from a Republican in Riverdale, GA.
Independent, non-partisan commissions do not and cannot exist. To claim otherwise is to deny everything we know to be true about human nature. Write a computer program that draws districts based on total population only. No issues such as race, socio-economic stratum, or political affiliation should be considered. 2yr ago from a Republican in Alva, OK.
It should be restructured in a way that leads to decreased spending. 2yr ago from a Republican in Timnath, CO.
Districts should be drawn by geography!!. 2yr ago from a Republican in Parkville, MD.
Yes, but there is not such thing as non partisan or independent. 2yr ago from a Republican in Pasadena, MD.
It should be that for every so many citizens there is a representative across the entire country by state. If there is not enough but close for an additional rep for any state, it should have a min and max as defined by a national vote. 2yr ago from a Republican in Mount Wolf, PA.
It shouldn't be allowed that districts be redrawn for political means at all. 2yr ago from a Republican in Barrington, IL.
It will NEVER be fair. Every human has a political sway regardless if they are "labeled" non-partisan. 2yr ago from a Republican in Chambersburg, PA.
Draw the district one time and never redraw it. Have a drawing to draw the district lines. 2yr ago from a Republican in Charlotte, NC.
Should be a random citizen group selected like Jury Duty. 2yr ago from a Republican in Rensselaer, NY.
Yes, assuming it is comprised of a truly non-partisan commission and the commission is forced to break their own "ties" and it does not allow for an appeal process outside of that venue, (which would likely make it unconstitutional). 2yr ago from a Republican in Portland, OR.
There never has been, and never can be a non-partisan commission or group. Let each legislature draw and redraw, but no more than once per year. 2yr ago from a Republican in Kennedale, TX.
Insist that the districts be both geographically coherent and interests homogeneous (don't mix cities and rural areas, if possible), If part is ranching and part id]\s farming, two districts might be best choice--one of each. 2yr ago from a Republican in La Vista, NE.
Any commission would be corruptible. Every congressional district map needs to be approved by the state electorate in a general election. 2yr ago from a Republican in Columbia, MD.
Vote according to county boundaries. Political power should not be based on race or gender. We have county and state boundaries based upon past political power. Leave it alone. Majority rules. 2yr ago from a Republican in Charleston, WV.
Redraw districts to maximize area and minimize perimeter. districts must be continuous. Randomly choose one of the corners of the state to start from each redistricting period. 2yr ago from a Republican in Oklahoma City, OK.
How would you know it is non-partisan? Things like this have been done before and partisanship always comes into play, because in the end people are individuals and have opinions. 2yr ago from a Republican in Hanover, MD.
The majority party should be allowed to redraw congressional districts, but only by keeping an entire county intact, or dividing a county in half either north-south or east-west along the geographic middle of the county, and congressional districts that contain multiple counties or partial counties must all be connected. 2yr ago from a Republican in Bucyrus, OH.
No, allow the local citizens to vote on the newly formed boundaries. 2yr ago from a Republican in Redmond, WA.
If there were a way to absolutely confirm that each member of a non-partisan commission were open to all possibilities then yes. Maybe, some type of voir dire approach would work. 2yr ago from a Republican in Meridian, ID.
Yes, we should switch to a the shortest splitline algorithm format, which would ensure equitable constituent districts (population numbers) that would force politicians to govern from the center, rather than the current system which allows for the catering to extremist positions. 2yr ago from a Republican in Halethorpe, MD.
Hahahahahaha! ROFLOL. No one is impartial. 2yr ago from a Republican in Dallas, TX.
There is no way to keep the panel free Except by Random, lets say Jury duty people of our peers being randomly selected. and the job could only ever be done ONCE. 2yr ago from a Republican in La Mesa, CA.
Draw grid lines over the entire US. each grid should be a district regardless of the population within that grid space. Each grid should equal a certain number of square miles. 2yr ago from a Republican in Waynesboro, PA.
No - there is no such thing as an independent, non-partisan commission. 2yr ago from a Republican in Spring Creek, TN.
Yes, the the limit of Lobbyists also should be selected PROPORTIONALLY, as should Congressional districts, with limited gratuity. 2yr ago from a Republican in Bradford, OH.
Let me pick them all. 2yr ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS.
I have no idea what it means, therefore I do not have an opinion. 2yr ago from a Republican in South Haven, MI.
Use the central point of each state as a reference and create House districts based on population distribution without regard race, national origin or other biasing factors. Each district will be rectangular with equilateral sides were possible. 2yr ago from a Republican in Goldsboro, NC.
I do not know enough about this to give a qualified opinion. 2yr ago from a Republican in Fairborn, OH.
Don't know enough about how this works to express an opinion. 2yr ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS.
Current system requiring review of districts by courts is sufficient. 2yr ago from a Republican in Riverview, FL.
No, because then we'll be so busy arguing over non-partisan status of commissioners that they'll never even get to the task of redrawing boundaries. 2yr ago from a Republican in Woodbridge, VA.
It should be done by a computer program that takes area distance and population numbers into consideration to create equal population areas for representation. 2yr ago from a Republican in Holden, MA.
No, election should be state wide and the number of districts should be represented by the descending order in which they finished the state wide race. example; State divided into 20 districts, the top 20 vote getters would serve. 2yr ago from a Republican in Dallas, TX.
Gerrymandering should be eliminated. Set the districts once and for all and let them be. If you need to redraw the playing field in order to win you should not be playing the game. 2yr ago from a Republican in Hanover, NH.
A geographical approach rather than a demographic one should be used. 2yr ago from a Republican in Cincinnati, OH.
Districts should be based entirely on geography. Set up each district to be uniform and keep politicians out of the equation. 2yr ago from a Republican in Corbin, VA.
Allow redrawing district line to balance population in districts, not to concentrate political affiliations. 2yr ago from a Republican in Livingston, TX.