More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Democrats
Last answered 3 months ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Democrats.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 16, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Olmsted Lock & Dam
As part of the October 16th, 2013 deal to extend the debt limit, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell received a provision for the Olmsted Lock and Dam in his home state of Kentucky. Section 123 of the Senate’s plan to reopen the government and extend the debt ceiling called for the Federal Government to increase funding for the Olmsted Lock and Dam from $775 million to nearly $3 billion. See recent Olmsted Lock and Dam news
More stances on this issue
I don't know enough on this topic to answer. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Burlington, KY
Yes, though McConnell shouldn't have had to play it the way he did. The U.S. Government should increase spending for all infrastructure needs before our bridges and interstates, etc., fall apart. That's one of the main roles of government. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Louisville, KY
Clearly it's a quid pro quo. Does it benefit the country more than what that $2.25 billion would have otherwise done? Where did the money come from?. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Yonkers, NY
Yes, this is exactly the sort of large, economically critical infrastructure development that the Federal government should be involved in. 3 years ago from a Democrat in East Grand Forks, MN
No! What makes this dam more important than any other community landmark? Ridiculous, I had no idea about this!. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Deerfield Beach, FL
Federal infrastructure funding should generally be increased; however, this bill was the wrong time and place. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Montgomery, AL
An increase from 775 billion to 3 billion is too much. If the dam is necessary, take steps to fund it a little cheaper. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Littleton, CO