More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Democrats
Last answered 3 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Democrats.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Oct 10, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
2 years ago by msnbc.com
3 years ago by youtube.com
3 years ago by nationaljournal.com
3 years ago by bbc.co.uk
3 years ago by bbc.co.uk
3 years ago by nypost.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
About Professor Roger E.A. Farmer
Professor Roger E.A. Farmer is the author of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0195397916/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0195397916&linkCode=as2&tag=isidewcom-20">How the Economy Works: Confidence, Crashes and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies</a> and the visiting 2013 Senior Houblon Norman Fellow at the Bank of England. He is a Distinguished Professor of Economics at UCLA and served as Department Chair from July 2008 through December 2012. He is a co-winner of the 2013 Maurice Allais Prize in Economic Science for his work on the inefficiency of financial markets; and in 2000, he received the University of Helsinki Medal in recognition of his work on self-fulfilling prophecies. He has served as a consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Reserve Bank of Australia, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England and is a Visiting Scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Follow him at <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/farmerrf">@farmerrf</a>
More stances on this issue
Yes, but only by creating a direct jobs program to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. Our roads, water systems, sewage systems, bridges, electrical grid, etc. are all falling apart while the politicians throw more and more money away. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Potwin, KS
The Federal Government should increase spending and increase taxes on the wealthiest of Americans back to Post World War II levels. The Federal Government should also back a .75% student loan rate and reduce the cost of Education. The Federal Government... 3 years ago from a Democrat in Mesa, AZ
Cut spending on wars.... There is your money. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Chicago, IL
The Federal government should take action to reduce costs of education at all levels, focusing on areas of technological need. Increased subsidies are possible. Technology-based employment projects, similar to the land/road building programs of the... 3 years ago from a Democrat in Lansdale, PA
Yes, for incentives in the private sector to increase hiring rate. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Comstock, MI
No tax breaks to corporations unless they bring jobs back to the U.S. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Manchaca, TX
Only during steep recessions and only for a limited period of time. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Manhattan, NY
Yes, a federal stimulus will create jobs and help our economy, and the increased income tax revenue will more than pay for the stimulus that produced it. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Cary, NC
Yes, by giving money to the poorest 30% of the population. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Medina, WA
Theoretically yes, but I would like to see a detailed plan on how that would work. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Norcross, GA
If the government would fund infrastructure improvements it would be win/win situation. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Bakewell, TN
To be completely honest, the theory of trickle-down economics seems to correlate with the massive bubbles that ruined our economy twice in 30 years.
I don't mean to say that correlation implied causation, but during this time, employment rates
... 3 years ago from a Democrat in Clermont, FL
Only if the money is traceable, people are held accountable, and the work has merit (i.e., upgrade water lines, fix structurally deficient bridges). 3 years ago from a Democrat in Glenshaw, PA
Yes, directed toward public works projects and R&D in engineering and medical fields. Our infrastructure is so outdated!. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Brook Park, OH
No, unless the spending will have a direct effect on unemployment - spending money does not create jobs, they have to strategically spend it in a sector where people can work but currently are not in order to help reduce unemployment. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Norge, VA
In times of recession and depression yes increase federal spending to reduce unemployment. 3 years ago from a Democrat in College Station, TX
Only if the spending is in the form of career training. The American worker is under prepared for tomorrow's work force. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Athol, MA
Yes. The federal government needs to apply a targeted stimulus designed to spur Research and Development and infrastructure. Infrastructure maintenance is money that has to be spent eventually, and there is plenty of labor out there in construction. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Hallowell, ME
Only when the economy is in tail spin. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Tucson, AZ