Try the political quiz
Quiz  |  Polls  |  Parties  |  Discuss  |  Elections  |  Candidates  | 
Answer ThisRemind me to vote

More Popular Issues

See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...

“The Senate does not have to hold a hearing. Liberals say the Senate can't wait until the next presidency and has to at least hold a hearing, but back in 2007, left wing senator Charles Schumer and the democratic senate stalled George W. Bush's nominee for over 16 months. Why shouldn't this Senate be able to wait a mere 8 months? Plus Merrick Garland is too liberal for me, the deal is with Garland is that he's nearly moderate besides the fact he's totally against gun rights. If he gets inducted to The Supreme Court, you can kiss your gun rights goodbye. But, if Hillary Clinton and the very off chance Bernie Sanders wins the presidency, the republican senate should consider the moderate Merrick Garland in the last 2 months or so of Obama's presidency instead of the extreme left wing nominee Sanders or Clinton would nominate.”

From a Republican in North Port, FL
In reponse to: Should the Senate hold hearings and a vote on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee?

Discuss this stance...

Yes