No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone

The "No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone" argument against using the No-Fly List for gun control raises concerns about potential overreach and erosion of Second Amendment rights. It's important to address these concerns by emphasizing the need for due process and accuracy in identifying potential threats on the list. Implementing gun restrictions solely based on the No-Fly List without ensuring transparency and accuracy could infringe on individuals' rights and set a precedent for government overreach.

Government historically has always taken liberties to try and confiscate arms from people so they cannot defend themselves. If they implement this method, they can make up false charges to get you on that list and suddenly you no longer have the right to bare arms. Slippery slope. Same applies to red flag laws and ALL GUN CONTROL. It is ALL a slippery slope to confiscation. Well meaning or not, it will eventually be abused as history has always shown. Just look at recent historical examples in the last century.

Due process is necessary and constitutional, if due process is overlooked it will give the government too much power.

First, they will start with the no-fly list, then felons, then anyone with a criminal record, then everyone.

Good, I don’t believe you should own a gun if you can’t fly on the no fly list, there should be more ballots where the actual citizens vote on the issues and if it’s a slippery slope there should be safeguards built into the laws

Guns regardless make a profit due to the funding provided due to the military. It would simply prevent people who are deemed so dangerous that they are not even allowed on public air-born transportation to not potentially harm people's family and kids. The restrictions are to prevent potential attacks, simply like how pocket knives, etc. are not allowed on the aircraft to keep employees and passengers safe.