Foreign electoral interventions are attempts by governments, covertly or overtly, to influence elections in another country. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin concluded that the country intervening in most foreign elections was the United States with 81 interventions, followed by Russia (including the former Soviet Union) with 36 interventions from 1946 to 2000. In July 2018 U.S. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment that would have prevented U.S. intelligence agencies from receiving funding that could be used to interfere in the elections of foreign governments. The amendment would…
Read more@ISIDEWITH6yrs6Y
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
If it meets our needs, we plant the seeds. (Referencing our previous interest in the middle east, Israel and Ukraine.) Now if it's another country, consumed with greed, then it may need to bleed. (Referencing Russia's interference in our election). That is my stance on foreign policy. Folks, you have to understand we have to defend our soil on every soil. We have to express America's interests in other interests. An attack on one of us is attack on all of us. Don't let Ukraine into NATO but make sure Russia knows he can't run from all us or hide in China's shadow.
@9FR9TC78mos8MO
Only Americans can vote in elections. We will mind our own business, and you better mind yours as well.
@9FP63JH8mos8MO
I believe that we should try to influence other country's elections and policy because foreign countries, can be possible terrorist threats.
@9G8HYWY7mos7MO
How sharp are your debate skills? Give your most compelling counter argument to someone who answers “No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy” to the question “Should the government attempt to influence foreign elections?”. Your argument will go on the discussions page for others to rate and respond to.
@ISIDEWITH6yrs6Y
Yes
@9FP628D 8mos8MO
No, with our values of fair and unrigged elections on our soil, attempting to rig foreign elections is hypocritical.
@9FPGH768mos8MO
Even if it wasn’t an authoritarian nation like China or Russia, would you be fine with the EU or Taiwan bribing politicians to fill their pockets?
@9GDDCTR7mos7MO
We got upset when we suspected foreign governments interfering with ours. Why should we interfere with others? It's hypocritical.
@9G8HYWY7mos7MO
How sharp are your persuasion skills? Give your most compelling argument for why someone should agree with your “Yes” answer to the question “Should the government attempt to influence foreign elections?”. Your argument will go on the discussions page for others to rate and respond to.
@ISIDEWITH6yrs6Y
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
@9GLFG7R7mos7MO
While it is important to address security threats, it is equally important to consider the potential monetary interests that foreign interference in elections can have. In many cases, foreign powers may seek to influence election outcomes in order to further their own economic interests, gain access to resources, or undermine potential competitors. This can have serious consequences for the affected country's economy, as well as for global stability. Therefore, it is crucial that we address both security threats and monetary interests when it comes to foreign interference in elections.
@9FX326Y8mos8MO
If their country elects a bad leader let it fall apart so we can come in, save the day, and then elect our own officials there as its a new state.
@9FP63JH8mos8MO
If we help with foreign country elections, we can increase the number of rivals. Which in turn can help the U.S.'s economic system, trade system, and more.
@ISIDEWITH6yrs6Y
@ISIDEWITH6yrs6Y
@8L5CPPS4yrs4Y
No, we should not influence their elections like we don’t want them influencing ours
No, Only in just retaliation
This seems to do more harm than good.
@8JQ5G734yrs4Y
Yes, but not monetarily during the elections, but through promises made if a preferred nominee is elected
@9M59LGJ2wks2W
The government should only influence foreign elections if it is a direct threat the the United States. If it is not, then the government should allow other countries to create their own path and work through their own elections.
We should make sure people are aware of the problems in their country, but we should let them make their own decisions.
Yes, to promote our interests and democracy, protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and address security threats
@9KLLSFBRepublican 2mos2MO
Yes, but only to address security threats, safeguard human rights, and as long as democracy is not impeded upon.
@8T3M48Q3yrs3Y
No way, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
@8RDN3R33yrs3Y
Only if it’s a pro life candidate
@8LRYLLV4yrs4Y
we shouldn't influence the elections but we should influence the government
@8LRWJFN4yrs4Y
@8LNV6DR4yrs4Y
No. If we're not okay with other countries attempting to influence our elections, we shouldn't be okay with our country attempting to influence other countries' elections.
@8LLP3Z44yrs4Y
No country should be able to interfere with another country's elections and if found to do so should be treated as a direct act of war.
@8LJHYPR4yrs4Y
We don't want foreign tampering in our elections, so we shouldn't tamper in others. However, we could publicly endorse a candidate in a foreign election without tampering.
@8LL5J4B4yrs4Y
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests and to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, not tamper with a fair voting process
@8LBLXT24yrs4Y
I don't understand this topic much
@8LBJYJCRepublican4yrs4Y
@8LBHWL24yrs4Y
It is perfectly acceptable to state the US' preference but not rig elections
@8L8N3XC4yrs4Y
Yes, but they should expect other nations to try and influence US elections.
@8L5H33V4yrs4Y
No, but federal officials should encourage fair and democratic elections in foreign nations.
@8L4DP534yrs4Y
We can try to influence elections, but we should expect other countries to try to influence our elections as well.
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process, and only to protect against human rights violations
@8KXPDRM4yrs4Y
If they did it to us we should do it to them 10 fold.
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler and only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
Yes to the countries line Russia that Is doing it to us.
@8KVP2TT4yrs4Y
No nation should influence another nation when it comes to elections, Period.
@8KRV2PJ4yrs4Y
Yes. At MOST, our government should run projects aimed at educating the public about how various elections could affect us.
@8KNQ5Y5Republican4yrs4Y
Yes, to overthrow a tyrannical regime that threatens the U.S.
@74TXV99Independent4yrs4Y
It depends, it would only be to protect countries from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, only to influence public opinion and not to tamper with a fair voting process, and only to address security threats to that country and not for monetary interests
@8KKZCYQ4yrs4Y
No one should influence foreign elections, the government should also not influence local elections as well.
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler and never to tamper with a fair voting process
@8KJ6DX54yrs4Y
Not as long as they are free and fair.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...