@9FLM7P79mos9MO
No, the firearm dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the people who have used firearms to commit crimes.
@9FL72T99mos9MO
You sue the person who used the gun, not the person who made it, as the person who made the gun also made guns to help prevent criminal action.
@9FLPP5W9mos9MO
You have the right to sue but why sue the seller they have no control of what the person they sell to do with the gun.
@9MC2G2R1mo1MO
Ok, so what’s next? Suing the wood company because your house fell on you? The gun did what it was supposed to do; it killed someone. This wasn’t some blind siding thing.
@9M26C4Q1mo1MO
I mean you can use whoever you want but if you expect to get money from someone who legally sold someone a gun that happened to do something illegal with it than I would argue that you are an idiot.
@9MLXYBDIndependent4wks4W
I don't think it's ok to sue anyone for any reason for gun liability and both parties should pay the same amount.
@9LZ5YCFIndependent1mo1MO
No, the firearm dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the people who have used firearms to commit crimes.
@9N8JYJVLibertarian 2wks2W
The First Amendment right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” has been wrongly, over broadly interpreted as a right for anyone to sue anyone for any reason.
Unless the government manufacturered or distributed that weapon, it's a non sequitur.
@9FLJYZT9mos9MO
unless it is a major company then a proven person would need a sponsor in case their case is lost so that is why they can pay the legal fees.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...