Should AI be used to make decisions in criminal justice systems?

Yes

ASBOLUTELY NOT, and AI is not a person NOR a PEER which would be making a mockery of our legal system which is already plagued by several other issues.

No, not yet. More studies need to be conducted first

Yes, AI should be used to provide/synthesize information, that informs decisions but should not make the decision. All information should be evaluated for accuracy.

Yes, but the AI system should be used as a resource to assist in decision making, not to make the decision

yes, how ever Ai needs to be inspected and absolutely proven. All juros needs to be educated about AI because it is very trippy

I think it depends, AI gets there "minds" from whoever programs and creates it so how would the system know if the AI is biased of not.

No, but the applications of artificial intelligence in criminal justice systems should be looked into

No, Ai can mistakenly be misused and can be manipulated by criminals.

Yes but the judge should declare the final verdict.

As of right now, no. As they improve, it may be able to be used but it would need massive checks for biases first.

I think it can help give objective thought processes, but I do not think it should be the end all be all.

It could be usful, but it could just as well be hacked and wrongfully free a bunch of criminals

Somewhat, I think they can help go deeper into a case but shouldn't be used to make a full decision.

yes and no I think that it wouldn't make best depositions but I don't thank that the laws not always right and in some cases it should be up to how moral the decision is

Yes, a machine has no moral say on matters, it can execute a sentence or assist in law enforcement without second guessing itself

No, they lack the judgement that we humans possess.

To some extent, yes, however human intervention is imperative.

No, but it should be used to assist in analyzing the facts of a case

An AI model could be implemented to compare and contrast court findings and rulings and eliminate bias.

No - the technology is not ready for something like this. However, I'll re-evaluated this for 2028.

There’s some instances where AI is helpful, and others where AI won’t be helpful

No, but it is instead used to sum up the information in a case to provide a clearer picture of all evidence provided, not to make decisions.

No, AI should not people do things because of emotions and other people can feel emotions but robots can't.

Yes, as long as there is a governance committee driving the personas, parameters and workflows in use, and 4 sigma plus quality evaluations.

Yes, as long as we can be sure it’s programmed to eliminate bias AND is used as a tool for people to make decisions and it isn’t making the decision itself.

I have never given this any thought before… I can see both sides of the issue, tbh.

We should let AI be a juror but also let humans decide

Maybe once we can prove it’s ready. It would be better than humans. Humans are faulty and make mistakes

Not yet. Too new and untested but it is an interesting thought and seems to be the future once we figure more out about AI.

Yes, and maybe there should just be a big rewind button for S,os in any house so they can go back in time and delete evidence everything will go back to normal

Not make, but maybe assist and provide logical flow of gathered information, while still retaining ethical and empathetic views

no because Ai will choose purely what is legal and illegal, they lack human emotions and the understanding in situations where someone either deserves justice from being raped or a family member killed or situations where it was in self defense.

Sure but with many limitations and no over reliance.

AI would be able to provide an unbiased decision as it can analyze and examine all presenting evidence.

No, AI is based on the existing mindset and will have the existing bias present by those designing it.

Yes, a robot judge / jury can surely be more impartial than what we have now. No mercy, but also no corruption.

No, they can advise the judge on past punishments, record transcripts, and translate but not make decision.

Artificial Intelligence can not make decisions on its own anyway. What it can do is help speed up the process of finalising a decision.

No, this will move the criminal justice system in a backwards, direction and stifle civil liberties. All legal matters should be handled by humans.

No, not until it’s far better regulated to account for preexisting human biases and ensure accountability

Yes, and maybe there should just be a big rewind button only for S,os in any house so they can go back in time and delete evidence everything will go back to normal

Yes, but not to issue rulings and sentences, only to collect all potentially relevant case files and precedents so every defendant has a more fair trial overall.

No, because it is unethical and violated amendment rights

Yes, but only for supplemental research and aiding in decision making. It should not be the final answer

No, and impose strict regulations on the use of AI in all law systems

Begin with implementing AI in specialized mock criminal trials to study their effectiveness, then adjust AI programs accordingly before gradually including them in criminal trials.

Yes, but enable human say to have a stronger weigh on the outcome.

I think yes, and it should be looked over by people.