Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
@9P9DXRGProgressive8hrs8H
No, but increase investment for public transit in low income areas.
@9CHBHW4 3 days3D
Yes, if public transportation isn't possible, however preferably you don't, because that is being used to create and maintain public transit.
@9NZCGLL5 days5D
No, invest in free and consistent public transportation
@9NYS7RL5 days5D
Subsidize and expand public transportation and improve high-speed rail and other options. Make the US less reliant on automobile travel.
No, they should provide free or reduced-cost public transportation instead.
@9NV3CVZ7 days7D
No, decrease prices for all public transportation fares instead.
@9NT9RF21wk1W
Yes, for the time period that public transportation closes down/doesn't run.
@9NQDDVSRepublican1wk1W
It looks good on paper but taxpayers must be given a say and spending these subsidies must be carefully examined.
@9NPXKX81wk1W
No, and the fares for public transportation should be controlled so that everyone pay the same price for riding public transport.
@9NP7RH61wk1W
No, increase spending on public transportation instead.
@9NJYZW7 1wk1W
Yes, but prioritize subsidies for public transportation over uber and lyft.
@6273V9Y 1wk1W
Yes, if the individual requires such services to get to and from work.
@9NLF3PX2wks2W
No, just replace income and sales taxes with a land value tax and a tax refund for low income people
No, but because public transit should receive the attention.
@9NH6JJJ 2wks2W
Yes, but only for certain situations (e.g. job, healthcare, etc.) and if public transit isn't sufficient.
@9NG23ZY2wks2W
No, but make public transportation more affordable and accessible
@9NFQ4S6 2wks2W
Yes, only for certain situations and if public transit is not sufficient
@9NFG6YX2wks2W
No, we should focus on improving public transportation rather than subsidizing private transportation.
@9NFF24MProgressive2wks2W
Yes, public transportation is unreliable when it's even available.
@9NB6KJF2wks2W
There should be a national public transportation system
@9N5WBYD3wks3W
No, not until 'Gig Economy' is regulated to give its workers equal rights to employees.
@9N4KNQF3wks3W
Yes, but only for certain situations (occupational, medical, etc.) if public transportation is not sufficient
No, they should invest in public transportation like buses, trains, and subways
@9MYQ4753wks3W
Regardless, the government should invest in more walkable cities and public transportation.
No, and it should instead fund public transportation
@9MY56NM3wks3W
No, the the government should subsidize public transportation, not private companies
@9MTZNC43wks3W
Yes, but don’t subsidize the services themselves lest the funds be misused. Instead provide incentives to consumers to make use of ride-sharing services in areas where public transportation is inefficient
@9MSNM83Independent3wks3W
No, I think transportation accessibility it a critical contemporary right, but is better addressed through Jaunt programs, public transportation subsidies, and incentivizing employers to provide ride-share programs & other transport services.
Yes, in areas where public transit is not a feasible option.
@9MQ46RN4wks4W
Yes, provided the transportation is commuting to or from work or a medical or government facility
@99M6G59Independent 4wks4W
No, ride-sharing services should compete with one another on price and convenience
@9MMX76R4wks4W
No, since the companies subsidize them privately. Public transportation should be funded more instead, and be more accessible/safer.
@Dry550Independent 4wks4W
Yes, both sides make a strong case, however, people should be able to get around faster and comfortably rather than walk everywhere
@ISIDEWITH4wks4W
No
@9NMPHN51wk1W
It grows the economy by providing jobs and offering a service for lower income individuals to use to get out of poverty. Makes the economy more productive and it’s using our tax dollars to recycle into our own economy instead of throwing it away to foreign nations.
@ISIDEWITH4wks4W
Yes
@9NMPHN51wk1W
Imagine being broke and unable to afford a car but you are stuck on government checks and can’t escape it because you don’t have a way to. Subsidized ride share is a way out.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
