Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
@9P9GDNJ6hrs6H
No, but provide financial incentives for companies to increase fuel efficiency
@9P9DXRGProgressive6hrs6H
Yes, to a socially acceptable degree. Demanding 40 gallons a mile is too much, but nothing should be allowed to operate on less then 14 miles a gallons without special licensing.
@9P7BKRH2 days2D
Yes, but the big automobile companies should be paying for these.
@ChivalKnightConstitution 4 days4D
No, the free market should dictate if cars become more fuel-efficient.
@9P3BRBG4 days4D
Yes, as long as production costs are subsidised and initiatives that impact overall emissions are in place.
@9NXW9RJ 5 days5D
No. Unleash the free market and innovation to improve fuel efficiency of vehicles.
@9L4Z23BIndependent 7 days7D
Yes, but a cost-benefit analysis needs to be done to completed to determine optimal standards
@9NV3CVZ7 days7D
No, and all fuel energy for public transportation resources by 2025 instead.
@9NSTP6Z1wk1W
No, focus on making cleaner public transportation.
@ccf88342709Democrat 1wk1W
No, but incentivize manufacturers who implement such standards
@9NRT9GGIndependent1wk1W
No, switch all public transportation resources to clean energy instead.
@9NPXKX81wk1W
Yes and and the use of fuel for public transportation, and make all transportation, electric, battery or solar powered
@9NHHTSR2wks2W
No, but it should provide incentives for more fuel efficient vehicles.
@9NF9B4MRepublican2wks2W
No, and current standards should be abolished and replaced with a general gas tax
@9N295MR 2wks2W
No, but we must continue to find ways to reduce fuel consumption & greenhouse gas emissions while simultaneously keeping gas prices low and we can do that by passing an executive order mandated that all gas companies cannot charge over $3 per gallon.
@JcawolfsonIndependent 2wks2W
Yes, to improve air quality and reduce health risks
@9N9NF6L2wks2W
Yes, it should be a national standard only not a state standard
@9N9CHQZ2wks2W
No, and reduce regulations on small to mid sized car and trucks.
@Meepmeep777 2wks2W
Yes, there is a Big market for smaller trucks that can alleviate this problem.
@9N5XMF73wks3W
Yes, the government should drastically increase the fuel efficiency standards for light utility vehicles, such as trucks and SUVs.
@9N5XMF73wks3W
No, the government should instead drastically increase the fuel efficiency standards for light utility vehicles, such as trucks and SUVs.
@9N5FGW93wks3W
No, unless they are ready to provide transportation in other ways for all low income individuals.
@9MZC778Libertarian3wks3W
No and repeal current standards that result in larger, less efficient being built over smaller vehicles like small pickups that can't meet standards.
@9MYY7PJ3wks3W
No, but there should be emission standards to reduce pollution and prevent poor air quality
The government should set a goal of 100% electric vehicles on our roads, and then make that happen.
@9MQ2X4M4wks4W
Yes, but I would rather focus on preserving fuel and make cars run more energy efficient.
@9MN8ZKT4wks4W
Yes, create stricter standards for SUVs and light trucks that have gotten away with less strict standards for years under CAFE laws
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...