Try the political quiz

4.8k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes

 @9FZCXDM from California disagreed…8mos8MO

Preschool is something that many students have skipped and even then, they had succeeded greatly. There is not need to fund Preschool

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

No

 @9F6S8N9 from Texas disagreed…9mos9MO

the government is centralized around education. we are expected to be fully educated by the time we are out of college, however, how are we supposed to be fully educated if the first building block costs more money that some people can pay

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

No, and all education should be privatized

 @9FV2C8P from Colorado disagreed…9mos9MO

As Simon Bolivar once stated "A people without education is like a building without a foundation", the underlying message in this quote is simply due to the foundations of the nation in itself reflect the education from the people to which a nation will progress or regress at a proportional rate to the education of the general population.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes, as long as parents also have the option to send their child to private school

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes, but funding should come from states instead of the federal government

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

 @959K74L from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

 @95K7BH7 from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

 @8FPNF73 from Indiana answered…4yrs4Y

It should be the parents' decision to send their child to preschool. Also, the state and the federal government should partially fund preschool and offer aid for low-income families.

 @8NS2CDJ from Minnesota answered…4yrs4Y

I think it should be offered, but parents have a choice to send their child, keep them home, or send to private school.

 @iandromidas from Colorado answered…4yrs4Y

 @85QWNPG from Colorado answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, all of schooling from preschool to college should be publicly owned and maintained universally for an equal footing.

 @9CGS28V from Florida answered…12mos12MO

 @9BBYBHL from Illinois answered…1yr1Y

No, this will give too much control to the government over our children.

 @8NH95DT from Arkansas answered…4yrs4Y

 @9GBWNDD from Pennsylvania answered…8mos8MO

No, and I was taught in K-12 education that making babies got you suspended. End all contradictory support for baby-making. We do not need babies, period.

 @9D6QLWZ from Texas answered…10mos10MO

 @9CFJ5BV from Texas answered…1yr1Y

No, you can do it for free by finding free curriculum online, finding other parents to make a preschool group, and taking turns being the teacher, or if you can't take the time to teach even once a week or so, contribute money or sweat equity.

 @9FGJMKX from Colorado answered…9mos9MO

The government should not fund any school, instead they should ban themselves from paying any teacher and abolish the teachers union so the parents can instead form a union and pay for all the school payments including kids who have disabilities or are too poor, so then everybody can get a refund plus extra so our economy can boom again.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…9mos9MO

Teachers will never get paid enough if they don’t have any unions to stand up against the lack of payment, parents won’t do that at all, and not every parent can afford school so you just designed an education system far worse than our current one.

 @ProgressiveSeafowlLibertarian from Virginia commented…9mos9MO

Indeed, your perspective brings to light the intricate complexities of our current educational paradigm. A world where parents bear the sole financial responsibility for education might not be equitable, for not all parents possess the same financial means. The absence of a union may lead to an imbalance of power, potentially diminishing the voice of our educators. It is a delicate balance, one that requires thoughtful consideration and action. Shouldn't we strive for a system that promotes both quality education and equality of opportunity?

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…9mos9MO

The teachers need much more of a voice than they have, but they also need to be honest about what’s happening face-to-face with parents. Parents that don’t attend meetings with teachers don’t get to complain about not being told something. We need increased funding for teachers, while holding a high standard as we currently do. They don’t get paid nearly enough, and the workload is insane, so publicly demonizing teachers is exactly how an education systems takes a turn for the worse.

We should try to teach to each students ability, while also trying to lift those strug…  Read more

 @8D78D3ZRepublican from Georgia answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but it should be state-funded and parents should have the option to send their kids to private schools

 @9CCVG5B from Texas commented…1yr1Y

No, young children ought to be with their parents, and parents ought to receive aid to be able to support them with only one parent working.

 @ConstitutionPathSocialistfrom Maine agreed…1yr1Y

One example of this approach is the Scandinavian model, where countries like Sweden, Denmark, and Norway prioritize family-friendly policies. These nations offer generous parental leave, financial support, and flexible work arrangements to encourage parents to spend more time with their young children. This not only strengthens the bond between parents and children but also promotes a healthy work-life balance.

What are your thoughts on implementing such family-friendly policies in the United States?

 @9BC2KGJ from Washington answered…1yr1Y

No. Preschool should be done at home unless there is a reason as to why it shouldn't/couldn't be done at home. I skipped kindergarten because I did preschool at home with my mom.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…1yr1Y

Not every family can afford the time/money to stay at home preschooling a kid, which is exactly what a public universal pre-K program would alleviate, since apparently higher wages and paid parental leave isn't an available option for some reason...

 @9B7HTWK from New York answered…1yr1Y

No, this will affect teacher’s union which can anytime protect those inefficient teachers and bad teachers from not getting fired

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…1yr1Y

There is literally no justification for why we shouldn't offer universal preschool. If you want better teachers, then pay them more.

 @9NMPV8B from Arizona answered…2wks2W

Yes as long as they give the option to pay mothers the same amount to stay home with the child if they decide to

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…2wks2W

No - we tried HeadStart and it failed. I think that industries - like hospitals that employ a lot of people with young children should provide for their employees nurseries and preschools to support their employees.

 @9N2NDHJ from California answered…3wks3W

Again complicated question. Where is the money coming from? How are the preschools managed for outcome?

 @9N2N5F4 from Oklahoma answered…3wks3W

Yes, but funding should be from the states, and parents should still have the option to send their children to private schools.

 @9MZ5HVT from New Jersey answered…3wks3W

Funding should be given without regulations on what children are taught. Educators should be paid more and given more freedom, and multiple BCBAs should be staffed at every school

 @9MV2QCDRepublican from Pennsylvania answered…3wks3W

How about no compulsory schooling that inflicts damage to kids and grooms them and where both government and company preys on them and makes them into slaves for the rest of their life.

 @9MRC79J from Pennsylvania answered…4wks4W

I mean preschoool doesn't do much you just sleep and do nothing and eat crackers with cheese and play

 @9K99V29  from Florida answered…1mo1MO

Yes, as long as the funding isn't single-handedly provided by the government and parents still have the choice to send their child to private school

 @9MDPLXG from Texas answered…1mo1MO

No, but maternal leave/pay should be an option for lower income families where mother was previously employed

 @9MBQJZPDemocrat from Wisconsin answered…1mo1MO

well it depends, if the preschool is actually teaching you life skills to move into school, yes but if its more of a daycare than no

 @9M99QFL from Wisconsin answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but it should not be required for children to attend school until they are at least 4k of kindergarten age

 @9M8NH48Independent from California answered…1mo1MO

I lean towards no because I believe that the parents have a decision to make whether or not to teach and work their child at home, place them in pre k, get them a tutor, or waiting for kindergarten

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...